An Adaptive (closed‑loop) AI starts from the same curated corpus but surrounds the generative engine with engineered context. Retrieval is filtered by build, module and even user role before the LLM drafts a response. Policy guard‑rails block version conflicts, cross‑process hazards and personally identifiable information, or PII. Every answer is scored—tickets closed lift confidence, escalations lower it—and those signals automatically re‑weight sources and tune the prompt. Accuracy begins in the mid‑seventies and compounds toward the nineties as the loop learns.

The Four Factors of AI Quality and Coverage

All support-bot performance—static, generative or adaptive—boils down to four critical factors:

​

1. Knowledge Base Quality & Version Coverage. Garbage in, garbage out—and only when your KB spans every active SAP B1 release (and patch level) can your AI handle customers on legacy or cutting-edge versions. If your corpus is missing v2007 notes or flags out-of-support versions, the bot simply won’t know the right fix.
    

2. Tuning Effort. How often and how easily can you refine the system? Static bots require massive manual overhauls after every SAP release. Generative bots need periodic re-indexing and prompt surgery. Adaptive AI applies tweaks incrementally & IMMEDIATELY, one ticket at a time, so improvements happen in real time, even for customers lagging behind in upgrades.
    

3. Self-Correction & Guard-Rails. Without a feedback loop, corrections are ad-hoc and belated, leading to drift. A closed-loop system captures outcome signals (ticket re-openings, escalations), enforces policy checks before answers go live, and rewrites its own retrieval weights and prompts—so accuracy compounds continuously.
    

4. ​Proactive Risk & Signal Quality. Capturing clean outcome signals isn’t enough. You need to track critical issue frequency by version, flag customers at risk of business-continuity disruptions, and translate support gaps into potential dollar-value lost. Only an adaptive system can dollarize risk for both bleeding-edge and long-tail legacy users.

In other words, you could have any generative engine at the core, but without a pipeline that ensures complete version coverage, minimal tuning overhead, robust guard-rails, and high-fidelity risk signals, you’re still chasing hype.

Study the three lines on this chart. The static curve climbs a little then flattens; each dot‑upgrade knocks it down another notch.
The generative curve rises higher but develops
a kink every release that must be ironed out by manual re‑grounding. The adaptive curve starts above them both and keeps climbing so smoothly that each release barely registers
as a blip.

Why Versioning Hurts the First Two

​

Every patch tweaks a field name, an API or an MRP rule. Static bots can’t tell v10.0 from v10.2, so they recycle a fix that no longer applies. Generative bots remix old and new documents into what sounds like expert guidance but can be dangerously wrong. Adaptive AI never surfaces an off‑version source in the first place and demotes any retrieval path that leads to a reopened ticket.

Inside the Closed Loop in Plain English

The workflow is simple: Detect the question, Act with a governed answer, Learn from the outcome.

During detection, the bot tags the user’s version and filters the knowledge base accordingly. During action, it runs the draft through guard‑rails that check version alignment, process impact and compliance. During learning, it watches the ticket: if the user accepts the answer, confidence goes up; if the ticket reopens, the retrieval path is demoted and the prompt tweaks itself automatically. No quarterly re‑train, no surprise drift.

Compounding Returns Over Time

Because every tenant’s interactions feed the same feedback engine, the system self-corrects and improves for everyone. More real‑world data means richer scoring which in turn means higher first‑answer accuracy—not just for the big accounts but for the newest sandbox instance that comes online tomorrow.

What That Delivers in the Real World

Pilot sites see 55–65 percent of first‑level tickets deflected by the bot. Senior B1 champions reclaim eight to ten hours every week for real projects, not as the in-house support team. New hires hit full productivity 30–50 percent faster and support teams shift their focus from low-value tasks to strategic initiatives.

See Your Own Curve

​​